home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: grapool30.rz.uni-frankfurt.de!news
- From: raftopou@stud.uni-frankfurt.de (Joerg Raftopoulos)
- Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.hardware
- Subject: Re: DCFS vs FFS on HARDRIVE
- Date: 11 Feb 96 01:40:14 +0100
- Organization: J. W. Goethe-Universitaet Frankfurt/Main
- Message-ID: <813.6615T100T748@stud.uni-frankfurt.de>
- References: <4elrc4$erl@ohnasn01.sinet.slb.com> <4et4l6$6kt@bambam.soi.city.ac.uk>
- <DM96GF.D9u@actrix.gen.nz> <19960204.536810.F900@ak180.du.pipex.com> <DMCpJy.A8B@actrix.gen.nz>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dialin154.rz.uni-frankfurt.de
- X-Newsreader: THOR 2.22 (Amiga;TCP/IP) *UNREGISTERED*
-
-
- >> DCFFS is _not_ safe - it has serious bugs in many OS versions. I think
- >> reasonably safe under 3.0, but badly broken under 3.1, which is what I
- >> lot of other people) use.
-
- CP> What version of l:fastfilesystem are you using. I used the KS 3.0
- CP> version for a while with no major problems, then upgraded to version 40.4
- CP> which I assumed was the KS3.1 version, it's more stable than the older
- CP> version, although I have had it trash a couple of directories, for no
- CP> apparent reason (you get files which show up in the directory, but cannot
- CP> be accessed or even deleted).
-
- fastfilesystem 40.4 is not a part of the os 3.1 package. you are dealing with
- a pirated beta version.
-
- 40.4 was programed to support blocksizes larger than 512 byte and is in fact
- very beta and very buggy. DELETE IT!
-
-